A Bipartisan Solution To The Nuclear Waste Problem. Bipartisan it may be, but it actually offers NOTHING as a solution. Which, admittedly, is fair because there is no (safe, affordable, assured) solution, and never will be. Nuclear Physics has made that VERY clear (to those who care to pay attention). But if that isn't enough, they can consider all the OTHER hazards of nuclear waste, from earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes and asteroids to transportation accidents, mishandling accidents (dropped canisters come to mind), bridge collapses and other human errors (including airplanes falling out of the sky), to war, sabotage, corruption (bad welds and thin walled containment systems come to mind), and terrorism — which can range from satchel charges dropped into nuclear waste silos by infiltrated saboteurs masquerading as diligent and humble workers (who might have passed dozens of background checks) to drone swarms launched suddenly, by the hundreds, from a nearby tractor-trailer being driven by an innocent long-haul trucker (a similar attack mode was used by Ukraine in the Russian war of aggression against their nation). Many of these potential vectors to tragic releases of massive quantities of nuclear waste are absolutely unpredictable as to WHEN or IF they will happen today or tomorrow — but one way or another, tragic and massive releases are all but inevitable over time unless we stop making more nuclear waste. So what is the Path Forward presented by the "experts" last month? Please read it yourself, but with my (snide but dare I say very appropriate!) comments, in color around the document. Here's the link: https://www.animatedsoftware.com/environment/2026/PathForward2026WithCommentsByAce20260201B.pdf At least read it through page eight. My comments end there, although I did skim the rest of course. Beyond page eight it's just total minutia unrelated to the reality of the problem, it's basically just how to steal money from the public in order to set up a corporation with the sole purpose of bribing a small community to harm itself forevermore. And for those who absolutely NEED a better solution: The better solution — the only possible solution — starts by admitting there are no safe, affordable, assured solutions to the problem of nuclear waste, and we need to stop manufacturing nuclear waste in nuclear reactors. They all need to be shut down forever. Ace Hoffman, Carlsbad, California USA
Contact information for the author of this newsletter:
Carlsbad, California USA
Author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry
Free download: acehoffman.org
Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com
YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org
Founder & Owner, The Animated Software Company
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments should be in good taste and include the commentator's full name and affiliation.