Sunday, March 20, 2011

QUAP: If there's a hell, it's surely radioactive... and looks like Fukushima Dai-ichi...

March 20th, 2011

Dear Readers,

Here's the news today: Japanese nuclear experts "might" be making SOME progress on cooling the overheated reactors and spent fuel pools at Fukushima Dai-ichi. The problem is, maybe they AREN'T making ANY progress at all! They just can't know. The internal temperatures of the reactor cores are unknown. Pressures at various places in the system are all that is known. The only thing that creates heat in the system -- and thus, pressure -- is the radioactive fuel. So the continued steam releases suggest fuel isn't cooling very quickly, and stability is NOT guaranteed at ANY of the three reactors that had the misfortune to be operating when the 9.0 earthquake struck.

An explosion of a reactor pressure vessel is not impossible. Those hydrogen explosions we've seen so far were NOT the reactor pressure vessels. Those would be even worse. Hydrogen OR steam explosions are possible within them. Such explosions would be much worse than anything we have seen so far, especially if such explosions cascade across reactors, a very real possibility.

The reactors all shut down as expected (depriving the area of much-needed electrical power) but for days or even weeks after a shutdown, reactors stay very, very hot, whether you get the control rods inserted properly, as apparently happened here, or not, as happened in Chernobyl. So in a sense, no reactor can be guaranteed to be safely shut down in a hurry. That should be obvious now.

After the approximately 25-foot tsunami waves struck an hour later, the site's many backup systems failed one by one by one... and things got neglected, too.

A better immediate grasp of the seriousness of their plight, causing faster responses such as bringing in extra pumps and power generators sooner, might have made a big difference. No matter who else needed them -- and everybody did, and does, including hospitals and sewage stations.

Flooding the reactors with seawater sooner might have helped. Flooding them with boric acid sooner. Ordering emergency shipments of boric acid from around the world sooner. Having a whole lot more on site... One can probably find a hundred things TEPCO did wrong in the first 24 hours alone.

The nuclear industry will admit to one or two of them and move forward unless we stop them. Every plant would make 100 mistakes in the first 24 hours, too. They did at Chernobyl and they did at Three Mile Island. At the Davis Besse plant in Ohio in 2002, nuclear "experts" ignored repeated clogged filters indicating something was seriously rusting out inside the plant -- it was the reactor pressure vessel! It was completely eroded in one place -- a football-sized hole -- and perhaps hours or days away from bursting. ONLY THE LINER (3/16ths of an inch thick!) was holding back the pressure (and the liner was bulging out already)!! Six inches of steal had eroded.

At the Monticello plant in Minnesota, bolts kept baffles for the Emergency Core Cooling System from flapping as they were shipped by truck from the manufacturer. To allow the ECCS to function, these "shipping bolts" were supposed to be removed during installation when the plant was constructed. They weren't, and nobody noticed. For thirty years.

So don't let anyone tell you it can't happen here. It can and it will, and it almost has many times. We won't be the lucky ones forever.

The Japanese are technological wizards. A year ago they were bragging about their nuclear technologies in fancy productions still available -- and laughable -- on You Tube. But a slew of 40-year-old reactors have them beat. Experts called in from around the world are also perplexed.

Venting of radioactive steam might have to go on for YEARS according to many experts.

Meanwhile, Libyan jets are being shot down on film. Good thing THEY are not falling onto reactors or spent fuel pools! They could be! There is a nuclear research center located in Tajura, just ten miles from Tripoli. And AREVA was negotiating to build power reactors in Libya, too! Hopefully that idea was scratched when French fighter jets were scrambled to attack the country instead.

News is now coming out that TEPCO, the owner of the stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors in Japan, wanted the U.S. military and the Japanese governments to take over three days into the disaster. But they were told that was "not an option." TEPCO employees understood this to literally mean, "keep going until YOU die" and many of them are apparently doing so.

Wall Street knew all along that nuclear power is a bad investment. Hence the need for "loan guarantees" and other billions of dollars in gifts every year to the nuclear industry. This accident will cost Japan hundreds of billions of dollars (tens of trillions of yen).

I've heard nuclear power called: "The most complicated way known to man to boil water."

But it looks pretty simple to me: Pour sea water on it, and the water boils away!

The nuclear demons charge dearly in lives, land, money, and futures. The price rises every day.

Uranium starts killing the moment the "quap" (the derogatory term science fiction writer H. G. Wells gave it, in his prescient way) is dug out of the ground. Splitting the uranium atom releases energy but also produces extremely deadly byproducts called fission products. Usually a two-for-one deal. You get two fission products for every uranium atom or plutonium atom that's split. These fission products are now being released, along with uranium and plutonium, into the atmosphere, farmlands, and water. This catastrophe will have a profound effect on human DNA globally, as well as on all other living things.

And just how many global nuclear accidents can the human genome tolerate? How many MUST we tolerate?

This latest nuclear cascade of accidents may not be the worst to come: Four nuclear reactors at two sites in California (where this author lives) might do the same thing tomorrow (or today). They have thousands of tons of spent fuel stored at these sites too, either in dry casks (which have no pool for dousing them with water if they catch fire) or in spent fuel pools, which, obviously, are also not safe.

Everyone knows "the big one" is coming to California soon. Huge earthquakes have struck three quadrants of the Pacific Rim -- the Ring of Fire -- recently. But not ours.

The ongoing Fukushima Dai-ichi disaster was really no accident: It was premeditated murder. Virtually every aspect of what's going on was predicted years ago.

Professor Francis A. Boyle considers nuclear power a Crime Against Humanity. I completely concur.

Below is a letter someone sent me about a way to take iodine. I am not a doctor and am not making any recommendations. Consult a physician, of course. If any doctors comment on this suggestion, I'll pass it on in a later newsletter.

Tut, tut, looks like rain. We're in for a heavy rain any minute now. Cesium-137, Strontium-90, Iodine-131, Tritium (Hydrogen-3)... here it comes.... what went up... must come DOWN!

Sincerely,

Ace Hoffman
Taking his forced dose of radioactive "sunshine vitamins" in
Carlsbad, California USA

The author's landmark visual/technical guide to the nuclear industry, The Code Killers, is available for free download from his web site: acehoffman.org . The author is grateful to anyone who forwards this message, publishes it, discusses it with others, or has simply read this far!


Useful educational material:

An interview with Dr. Ernest Sternglass was posted on You-Tube yesterday:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPO7Tft0YlQ

An interview with Karl Grossman was also posted yesterday:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrMDcZA-YjU

A news conference with CNIC Japan (the first half is translated into English), recorded today:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/13447172

Newsweek published a short article by Dr. Helen Caldicott called The Manhattan Meltdown Scenario:
http://www.newsweek.com/2011/03/20/the-manhattan-meltdown-scenario.html

Out of France comes a map which may or may not accurately predict, or indicate any actual values for, the wind plume from Fukushima Dai-ichi:
http://www.irsn.fr/FR/popup/Pages/irsn-meteo-france_19mars.aspx

Here is something from Nutritionist Sara Shannon's "Diet for the Atomic Age". Many other such diets are based on her book, first published in 1987 and updated and expanded in 1997:
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/NGP/Diet4AtomAge.html

Heavy stuff (the roof of the building?) goes up what appears to be 1000 feet or more (these are VERY big buildings) -- and then comes down on or very near the reactor, AFTER the cloud has drifted away somewhat. Terrifying. Watch closely:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_N-wNFSGyQ&feature=related


Iodine solution? At 10:47 AM 3/19/2011 -0700, Mark Smith wrote:

Dear Ace--

Many years ago on a motorcycle trip, I stayed for a week at the house of a woman in Del Mar. If I recall correctly, her name was Esther Czerny. She was an older woman from Vienna and in excellent health. She had the curious habit of putting two drops of tincture of iodine, the kind you put on minor cuts and scrapes that is marked "for external use only," into a glass of water every day, and drinking it. When I asked, she said it was to protect from radioactivity. I didn't think about it for years, until Chernobyl. Then it made sense to me, so I started doing the same thing for a while. I forgot about it again for years until Fukushima happened. Then I started doing it again. I don't know if it helps, but it doesn't seem to hurt.

--Mark


Letter to Canadian Premier Wall from Elaine Hughes (includes Francis Boyle's commentary):

Premier Wall - QUOTE: "Gorbachev described Chernobyl as "a warning sign" for countries dependent on nuclear power or keen to turn to it. " . . . .and now, we have the Nuclear Nightmare in Japan! As a follow-up to your most disappointing (point-less!) letter dated March 8, 2011 (see below) - which totally missed the concerns I set out in my email to you regarding the lessons to be learned by Chernobyl - you might want to examine your conscience within the context of the article below. What a shameful state of affairs that the Saskatchewan Government continues to tout our province around the world as the 'Saudi Arabia of Uranium'! And, continues its unnecessary and dangerous pursuit of more uranium mining, more uranium 'development', more so-called 'innovation', more radioactive waste with no way to handle it.

I urge you, once again, Premier Wall, to devote your time and my tax money to research and development of truly safe, sustainable and clean energy sources, and halt any and all needless activity related to uranium and its killer industry. Elaine Hughes Box 23 Archerwill, SK S0E 0B0 = = = = = = = = Nuclear Power Industry is a Crime Against Humanity

http://mwcnews.net/focus/letters-to-editors/9423-nuclear-power-industry-is-a-crime-against-humanity.html

by Francis Boyle March 20, 2011

QUOTE: ". . . . The same must be done by the other peoples in the world against their own Nuclear Power Industries, including and especially here in the United States, the originator of nuclear energy that was criminally used for the first two times at Hiroshima and Nagasaki against innocent Japanese Civilians, also a Crime Against Humanity."

Dear Friends:

I have now had the opportunity to review my information sources. I have already sent to you the basic thrust of my analysis: Namely, that the Japanese Nuclear Power Industry constitutes a Crime against Humanity as defined by Article 7 of the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court, to which Japan is a party. The same holds true for the Nuclear Power Industries in all the other countries of the World. You have the text of Rome Statute Article 7 below, which is directly on point. The Japanese People must now use this legal conclusion to terminate the Nuclear Power Industry in Japan, this ongoing Crime Against Humanity. The same must be done by the other peoples in the world against their own Nuclear Power Industries, including and especially here in the United States, the originator of nuclear energy that was criminally used for the first two times at Hiroshima and Nagasaki against innocent Japanese Civilians, also a Crime Against Humanity. The Japanese people are now being victimized once again by nuclear energy, only this time by your own Government and Business People in the Nuclear Power Industry.

As for the MOX, you know I have worked before with Junko Abe to stop the further deployment of MOX in Japan. MOX contains plutonium, the deadliest substance known to humanity. And there has already been an explosion at Fukushima Reactor No. 3 containing MOX/plutonium. The Japanese People must demand that the Japanese Government and Nuclear Power Industry inform them specifically about the plutonium at Reactor 3. Has the plutonium been released into the atmosphere already? So far they have said nothing about plutonium release. You must obtain this information and monitor it continuously. Perhaps it might be possible for private scientists and NGOs in Japan to start monitoring for plutonium release­we are starting to do this in the United States, not relying upon the U.S. Government to tell us the truth since they never do so when it comes to Nuclear Power. And you must now consult with private medical doctors and health experts about what to do about any plutonium release and the other radioactive substances that have already been released­cesium, strontium, etc. You must not trust the Japanese Government or the Japanese Nuclear Power Industry to tell you the truth. They are the ones who are responsible for this Crime against Humanity in the first place. The Japanese People must act to save yourselves from your own Government and Nuclear Power Industry.

I hope you find these comments to be useful. You have my permission to use them for a newspaper article.

Yours very truly,

Francis A. Boyle Professor of International Law University of Illinois College of Law

- - - -

Dear Friends:

It is very good to hear from you again. I wish to express my deepest sorrow to the Japanese People for all of their suffering as a result of the earthquake and tsunami. As a young Marine my Father arrived at Nagasaki on September 26, 1945. It must have been an horrific site. I am very saddened to see that the Japanese People are once again being victimized by nuclear energy.

It is early in the morning here. Before I respond to your questions, I want to study and examine my information sources that have come in over the night. Then I can adequately respond to your questions. I will perform this task sometime later today and then get back to you. In the meantime, let me state that the Nuclear Power Industry in Japan currently constitutes a Crime Against Humanity as defined by Article 7 of the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court, to which Japan is a contracting party:

Article 7

Crimes against humanity

1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:….

(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1:

(a) "Attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack; ….

You are free to publish this conclusion at this time in your newspaper if you wish. I will get back to you on the other questions later today after I have had the opportunity to study my information sources.

Yours very truly

Francis A. Boyle

Professor of International Law

###


Quotes collected by Ace Hoffman:
"Nuclear war must be the most carefully avoided topic of general significance in the contemporary world. People are not curious about the details." -- Paul Brians (author; quote is from: Nuclear Holocausts: Atomic War in Fiction)
"When fascism comes to America, it will come wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." -- Sinclair Lewis (first American Nobel Prize winner in Literature, 2.7.1885 - 1.10.1951)
"There is no such thing as a pro-nuclear environmentalist." -- Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa, 1992)
"Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." -- Sun Tzu (Chinese general b.500 BC)
"The most intolerable reactor of all may be one which comes successfully to the end of its planned life having produced mountains of radioactive waste for which there is no disposal safe from earthquake damage or sabotage." -- A. Stanley Thompson (a pioneer nuclear physicist who later realized the whole situation)
"Any dose is an overdose." -- Dr. John W. Gofman (another pioneer nuclear physicist who saw the light (9.21.1918 - 8.15.2007))
"Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears. To be led by a fool is to be led by the opportunists who control the fool. To be led by a thief is to offer up your most precious treasures to be stolen. To be led by a liar is to ask to be lied to. To be led by a tyrant is to sell yourself and those you love into slavery." -- Octavia Butler (science fiction writer, 7.22.1947 - 2.24.2006)
"If you want real welfare reform, you focus on a good education, good health care, and a good job.

If you want to reduce poverty, you focus on a good education, good healthcare, and a good job.

If you want a stable middle class, you focus on a good education, good health care, and a good job.

If you want to have citizens who can participate in democracy, you focus on a good education, good health care, and a good job.

And if you want to end the violence, you could build a million new prisons and you could fill them up, but you never end this cycle of violence unless you invest in the health and the skill and the intellect and the character of our children. You focus on a good education, good health care and a good job.

And other than that, I don't feel strongly about anything."

-- Paul Wellstone (US Senator, D-Minnesota, 7.21.1944 - 10.25.2002)


"There are no warlike peoples - just warlike leaders." -- Ralph Bunche (8.7.1903 - 12.9.1971)
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." -- Thomas Jefferson
"Please send this to everyone you know!" -- Ace Hoffman (original collector of the above quotes, January, 2008)


Ace Hoffman
Carlsbad, California USA
Author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry
Free download: acehoffman.org
Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com
YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org
Founder & Owner, The Animated Software Company



Saturday, March 19, 2011

Godzilla, Cutzilla, and other monsters from the deep blue sea...

March 19th, 2011

Dear Readers,

At last! Some levity! But not on a good day. Things aren't getting better yet, by any means.

However, Mark Fiore has released a marvelous animation on the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident:

http://www.markfiore.com/political-cartoons/watch-japan-earthquake-tsunami-nuclear-disaster-lobbyists-obama-animated-video-xeth-feinberg-mark-fiore-anima

tinyurl:
http://tinyurl.com/6gkbpff

Below(top), Deb Katz reports on the main spent fuel pool at Fukushima Dai-ichi, which apparently is unattended right now!

Below that, Marsha Rose asks an interesting question about pouring raw sea water on the reactors. My response appears below, followed by Rose's original letter.

Here is the only live radiation monitoring station I have found in SoCal:

http://www.enviroreporter.com/2011/03/enviroreporter-coms-radiation-station/

As I send this, all systems appear reasonably normal from this measuring device. "Normal" is apparently 40 to 48 counts per minute.

We certainly appreciate EnviroReporter for providing this webcam and monitoring system! Over two thousand people are using it right now.

My wife and I visited several stores yesterday, but could find no KI (Potassium Iodate) or anything like it. People had already bought everyone's stock of such things. We bought multi-vitamins instead and ate some kelp. Fortunately, we have some KI left over from Y2K... One web site indicates a seven-year shelf life, another indicated a greater than 99% effectiveness after 11 years, so we assume this is still good enough to use in an emergency... and this may certainly constitute an emergency at any moment.

However, I'm not sure what level, for example in Counts Per Minute, would constitute a reasonable time to start taking KI. More on that in the next newsletter, I hope...

One wonders if the Japanese habits of eating seaweed and taking their shoes off when they enter a house skewed the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bomb data significantly? I'll bet it could have -- IF that data had any integrity to begin with!

Sincerely,

Ace Hoffman, Carlsbad, California USA (images added 2025)


More terrifying news from Deb Katz (via facebook):
Giant "Common" Nuclear Waste Storage Pond to All Six Fukushima Daiichi Reactors Has Been Without Cooling

by Deb Katz on Saturday, March 19, 2011 at 4:30am

Giant "Common" Nuclear Waste Storage Pond to All Six Fukushima Daiichi Reactors Has Been Without Cooling

There is yet another surprise at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant complex.

The long awaited arrival of electrical power to Tokyo Electric Power Company's devastated Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station has yet another vital task to perform: restore cooling to an independent large scale common nuclear waste storage pond for all six nuclear units that has received no attention since loss of electricity following the earthquake and tsunami of March 11, 2011.

According to Yomiuri Shimbun news service (March 18, 2011), the giant common "spent" fuel storage pond has also been without cooling since the tsunami. The pool is not to be in any rated containment structure which is a concern if hydrogen gas generation leads to another explosion. The shared nuclear waste fuel assembly pool building is about 50 meters (150 feet) west of the now extremely radioactive Daiichi Unit 4. The common fuel pool facility has a total capacity of 6,800 highly irradiated fuel assemblies. According to TEPCO documentation from November 2010, the storage pool was at 90% capacity in March 2010 with 6,291 nuclear waste assemblies.

The large scale pool measures approximately 38 feet wide, 92 feet long and 35 feet deep. Highly radioactive nuclear waste assemblies that have been allowed to cool down in the six reactors' roof top storage ponds have been transferred and stored here since 1997. From this pool, some of the fuel has been loaded into more secure dry cask storage units awaiting shipment to the Rokkasho nuclear waste reprocessing facility.

According to Yomiuri Shimbun, TEPCO authorities have not been able to approach the largest nuclear waste storage facility at the complex because of high radiation levels emitting from Units 3 and 4. AS a result, it was reported that TEPCO has not been able to check the giant cooling pond's temperature and water level. However, TEPCO officials reassures that this nuclear waste also stored outside of a containment facility consists of the "coolest" assemblies in wet storage onsite.

However, even after two decades, a single used fuel assembly from a typical Boiling Water Reactor will emit over 3,000 BTU/hr

###


Salts of reactor fuel? Yecch!!
3/19/2011

Dear Marsha,

Yes, I'm sure it has created additional "monsters" they never calculated for. They are pouring sea water into the reactors and probably even onto the spent fuel pools.

Sea water combines with the radioactive isotopes. This combination being lofted into the atmosphere by being poured onto the burning reactors was against predictions in ways never considered in their many tens of thousands of reassuring pages claiming (falsely) that nuclear fuel, with its deadly rainbow of fission products, isn't a hazard to life on earth, it's a "manageable threat" in their opinion. But it's been mismanaged many times before this time, too.

Consider a line from a recent article I read, which believed this disaster would somehow be small. By "recent" I mean about a week ago, so I'll have to quote it from memory, paraphrase it, and not attribute it. But it goes something like this: "Fortunately, the vast majority of the radionuclides being released or that might be released in a nuclear fuel accident will be washed out to sea. There, some of the radioactive elements will combine with salts in the oceans to make very dangerous compounds. But fortunately most of these compounds will stay in the oceans until they decay. Hence, for Big Business, there's little to worry about."

Okay, I paraphrased that last line quite a bit, but they were saying not to worry.

But look at what's happening: They are pouring sea water onto fuel which is already burning and/or melting!

Steam releases, intentional or unintentional, happen regularly now. Fires, if they occur, are apparently being put out with sea water, which corrodes the metals very rapidly.

Fortunately, we have a lot of swimming pools near San Onofre were something like this (or a million other routes to the same thing) happen here. But to avoid lawsuits, they probably wouldn't dare empty them, so they'd probably use sea water here, too. Besides, it's closer.

Sincerely,

Ace Hoffman Watching the dust settle in Carlsbad, California USA

At 10:16 PM 3/18/2011 -1000, Marsha Rose wrote:

Thank you Ace,

As usual, your insights are profound. We on the downwinder list have been shouting. However, our shouts have been drowned out by the highly paid staff and management of the Atomic Energy Commission, the Nuclear Industry and the news media who rely on them.

The cover up began with General Grove of the Manhattan Project and The New York Times and has continued until today.

In orchestrating the official story of Hiroshima, as in so many aspects of the bomb, General Leslie Groves, military director of the Manhattan Project, played a central role.

In an internal memo, Groves warned that once the secret was out, "the project will be subject to harassing investigation, official inquiries ... and all the miscellany of crackpots, columnists, commentators, political aspirants, would-be authors and world savers."

To combat this, Groves proposed that officials "control the situation by the issuance of carefully written press releases." Indeed, from that moment on, control of nuclear commentary would be the government's goal until today.

Newspapers had to rely completely on information from the military. Press coverage amounted to little more than rewrites of War Department documents. But the War Department documents, it turns out, were written not by some military flack, but by a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, one of the great names in the history of The New York Times -- William L. Laurence .

William L. Laurence said that he was invited, as he disclosed, to "give lie" to Japanese claims "that radiations were responsible for deaths even after" the Hiroshima attack. Laurence, as always, complied, more than willing to be of service to the nuclear cause, even though, unlike all the other reporters, he knew about the fallout scare surrounding the Trinity shot, when animals died and Geiger counters clicked off the charts."

Back to today! You are a brilliant person and quite knowledgeable in this field. In fact, over the years I have learned so much from your writings. Thank you!

Now my question is - I'll set it up - when you burn anything the particles separate at the fire level, travel up into the atmosphere and then recombine as gravity sets in and fall to earth. That is the reason most incinerators where closed. Now by pouring contaminated sea water on the nuclear rods and who knows what else, as it burns and releases "stuff" into the atmosphere, NOW do we have any idea what is being released and when it falls will it have combined to create a new monster?


---- Original Message -----

>From: "Ace Hoffman" <rhoffman@animatedsoftware.com>

>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:16 AM

>Subject: Update: Grim. "Worse than Chernobyl..."

>3/16/11

>Dear Readers...

>


Additional commentary from Marsha Rose:
Australian Wilfred Burchett and American George Weller told the A-Bomb horror story, but one report was reviled and the other suppressed.

At the end of the Pacific War, as the entire allied press corps focused on Japan's formal surrender aboard the USS Missouri, Burchett on September 2, set off on a 20-hour train ride to Hiroshima, evading US military efforts to confine reporters to Tokyo and away from the A-bombed cities. Seated on a concrete block surrounded by devastation and typing on a Baby Hermes, Burchett began his dispatch: "In Hiroshima, thirty days after the first atomic bomb destroyed the city and shook the world, people are still dying, mysteriously and horribly -- people who were uninjured in the cataclysm from an unknown something which I can only describe as an atomic plague." He went on, "Hiroshima does not look like a bombed city. It looks as if a monster steamroller had passed over it and squashed it out of existence. I write these facts as dispassionately as I can in the hope that they will act as a warning to the world."
A Godzilla Gap?
At 05:06 PM 3/18/2011 -0700, "Make" Lemons-aid wrote:

We simply cannot afford to have a Godzilla gap!

What super power are you hoping to get?

I will take anything except the ability to command sea creatures. That one is pretty lame.


There are now reports from Japan that radioactive Iodine and Cesium have both been found in tap water.
View the SHUT SAN ONOFRE video and see that without every activists' help, the "powers that be" won't do a thing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK5oX-5MeR8




Ace Hoffman
Carlsbad, California USA
Author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry
Free download: acehoffman.org
Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com
YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org
Founder & Owner, The Animated Software Company



Friday, March 18, 2011

How come ((5X3)+(3X3)) isn't greater than, or even equal to, 6?

3/18/11

Dear Readers,

Radiation levels here in California have started to climb. Not much, they say, but a little.

If winds can bring the poisons here in just one week, they can't have ALSO "dispersed" the poison all that much! They didn't swirl and bifurcate and head all over the place. They just raced across the ocean, and here they are, bumping into the California coastline.

Thanks, GE. Thanks, TEPCO, Thanks, IAEA et al.

In one week a lot of the "fallout" would not have fallen out yet. There's sure to still be a lot of radioactive dust in the air, and we don't know where it will end up exactly. There may or may not be a Geiger counter nearby to measure it. And even with a good Geiger counter, a lot of the danger will be in the form of small particulates, and unless the Geiger counter just happens to be aimed right at those sources, it won't find them.

We all take our chances with everything we eat, drink, and breath after an accident like this.

If 3,000 Americans die over the next 20 years because of the unfolding tragedy at Fukushima Dai-ichi, that would be less than one in 100,000 people. You could not prove a single one of those deaths was caused by Fukushima, though. Even ten times that -- 30,000 -- would be hard if not impossible to prove scientifically.

In one sense, everyone should be angry, and several of the emails and calls I've been getting show a lot of emotion: "Ooooh, I HATE General Electric!!" one caller told me, for instance. "I'M ANGRY!" another said, asking me what to do to shut San Onofre down. I don't know. Contact our Senators and demand shut-down, not just more investigations and studies and reports, I guess!

In any event, anger is as useless an emotion as panic is. It appears the reactor operators may have panicked again and again as they tried to fight the fires, the spewing radioactivity, the dropping coolant levels, the cracking pipes, and the general mayhem at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear killing fields. They left a leaking spent fuel pool unattended and THAT's when the trouble REALLY started... I mean, things were bad before, but that's what pushed things over the edge: Simple negligence in the face of overwhelming stress.

Who says that can't happen here?

Who can possibly say that people as unprepared as San Onofre's operators are (they believe the "unthinkable" can't happen) will do the right thing and stay calm, and stay at their posts, when things beyond what THEY ever dreamed of, start to happen?

Discovery Online quoted Stephen Mahin, director of the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center at UC Berkeley, on the danger from underwater landslides nearby: "You have these big cliffs and those can cause local tsunamis which are far bigger than the distant ones," Mahin said. "But those are extremely hard to predict."

Who trusts ANYONE to know the odds now?

The nuclear disaster in Japan is utterly tragic beyond words. The words I've been finding only barely begin to describe the horror the Japanese people, and the rest of us to lesser degrees, are really facing.

985,000 dead from Chernobyl: That's the scientific opinion. And they didn't die easy. Cancer and other radiation diseases are notoriously painful, difficult to treat, and expensive, too.

Is Fukushima Dai-ichi worse than Chernobyl already? The spent fuel pools are burning, so the answer appears to this writer to be "yes" although so far, most "experts" still say no. Or they say, "Not yet." Or they say we don't have enough data. But the chief of TEPCO wept after he gave a news conference this morning. That should tell you something.

Sincerely,

Ace Hoffman
Waiting for clean air (but not holding his breath) in:
Carlsbad, CA

--------------------------------------------------------

Could a nuclear accident like what happened in Japan happen here? YES. Here's Linda Gunter, Beyond Nuclear, discussing GE Mark 1s and other dangerous nuclear reactors:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GsjRZu9pPI

--------------------------------------------------------

Is Fukushima Dai-ichi worse than Chernobyl? Not according to the IAEA, as explained below. But then, according to the IAEA, Chernobyl itself was only about 1% as bad as Chernobyl REALLY was!

--------------------------------------------------------
From: Radiation Bulletin <radbull@energy-net.org>
Subject: [Radbull] IAEA INES ratings

The IAEA made the following report on the INES ratings for Fukushima:

The INES scale goes from 1-7. As can be seen by this just detailed wikipedia definition/description of the scale, we have a long way to go before the chernobyl scale hits, except for one thing. We are looking at three INES 3 events and three INES 5 simultaneous events, So this is an example of a scenario that the IAEA has never properly defined in the context of what happens with so many reactors all reaching such a serious level. Personally, I'm surprised that the IAEA hasn't listed some kind of combined rating for this, or that they haven't challenged the spent fuel rating.

Japan Earthquake Update (18 March 2011, 10:15 UTC)

Japanese authorities have informed the IAEA that new INES ratings have been issued for some of the events relating to the nuclear emergency at the Fukushima Daiichi and Daini nuclear power plants.

Japanese authorities have assessed that the core damage at the Fukushima Daiichi 2 and 3 reactor Units caused by loss of all cooling function has been rated as 5 on the INES scale.

Japanese authorities have assessed that the loss of cooling and water supplying functions in the spent fuel pool of the Unit 4 reactor has been rated as 3.

Japanese authorities have assessed that the loss of cooling functions in the reactor Units 1, 2 and 4 of the Fukushima Daini nuclear power plant has also been rated as 3. All reactor Units at Fukushima Daini nuclear power plant are now in a cold shut down condition.

Addition of 12:45 UTC

Japanese authorities have assessed that the core damage at the Fukushima Daiichi 1 reactor unit caused by the loss of all cooling function has been rated as 5 on the INES scale.

--------------------------------------------------------
From Nukewatch:
--------------------------------------------------------
Radiation from Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant reaches California; experts: no health risk

BY Nancy Dillon
DAILY NEWS WEST COAST BUREAU CHIEF

Originally Published: Friday, March 18th 2011, 3:41 PM
Updated: Friday, March 18th 2011, 3:49 PM

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2011/03/18/2011-03-18_radiation_from_japans_fukushima_daiichi_nuclear_plant_reaches_california_experts.html#ixzz1GzJmzllg

Trace amounts of radiation from Japan's nuclear crisis have reportedly reached California - but they're nowhere near hazardous levels.

"(They're) about a billion times beneath levels that would be health threatening," a diplomat with access to radiation tracking by the U.N.'s Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization told the Associated Press.

The diplomat in Vienna said the initial reading came from an unnamed measuring station operated by the CTBTO, apparently in Sacramento.

Experts agree that any fallout wafting 5,500 miles across the Pacific to California will be too diluted to pose a health risk.

"It would be less than one microsievert," Dr. Keisuke Iwamoto, a radiation biologist at UCLA, told the Daily News. "To give you some perspective, a chest x-ray might be 100 microsieverts."

Still, some jittery residents are hoarding anti-radiation pills and fretting over the invisible threat as weather systems beat a path between the crippled Fukushima Daiichi plant and California.

"We've sold maybe 40 or 50 personal radiation detectors to people in California," Al Evan, the CEO of Security Pro USA in Los Angeles, told the Daily News. "Even though the radiation threat is minute, people are very concerned. We sold about a thousand packets of potassium iodide pills in two days. We're sold out."

California officials, meanwhile, said they're screening locally produced milk for any radiation contamination transmitted by grass-eating cows.

It's a precautionary measure, they said, since harmful levels are not expected to affect the milk supply.

An estimated 4,000 kids developed thyroid cancer after consuming milk contaminated with radioactive iodine after the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ndillon@nydailynews.com

_____________

March 18, 2011

Nancy,

Please consider the following federal government assessments of radiation dangers. (below)

Every U.S. agency that regulates radiation exposure agrees that there is no safe dose no matter how small. There are only "allowable" doses or "legally permitted doses." Today radiobiologists all agree that "one can no longer speak of a 'safe' dose level." (Ian Fairlie & Marvin Resnikoff, "No dose too low," The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Nov/Dec 1997, p. 54)

Following are the official U.S. government assessments:

National Council on Radiation Protection

"… every increment of radiation exposure produces an incremental increase in the risk of cancer." (National Council on Radiation Protection, "Evaluation of the Linear-Non-threshold Dose-Response Model for Ionizing Radiation," NCRP report 136, Bethesda, MD, June 4, 2001, cited in Science for Democratic Action, IEER, June 2005)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

"Current evidence suggests that any exposure to radiation poses some risk, i.e. there is no level below which we can say an exposure poses no risk." (U.S. EPA, "Radiation: Risks & Realities," Air & Radiation, 6602J, EPA 402-K-92-004, Aug. 1993)

U.S. Department of Energy

"[T]he effects of low levels of radiation are more difficult to determine because the major effect is a very slight increase in cancer risk. However, U.S. Government regulations assume that the effects of all radiation exposures are cumulative and should be limited as much as reasonably possible." (DOE/NE-0074, "Understanding Radiation," p. 8 & 9. <http://www.ne.doe.gov/pdfFiles/UNDERRAD.PDF>)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

"[T]he radiation protection community conservatively assumes that any amount of radiation may pose some risk for causing cancer and hereditary effect, and that the risk is higher for higher radiation exposures. A linear no-threshold dose-response relationship is used to describe the relationship between radiation dose and the occurrence of cancer. … any increase in dose, no matter how small, results in an incremental increase in risk." (U.S. NRC, "How Does Radiation Affect the Public?" www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/radiation/affect.html)

National Academy of Sciences

The National Academy of Science's ... committee further judges it unlikely that a threshold exists for the induction of cancers..." ( National Academy of Sciences, "Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2," Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council, June 29, 2005)


On 3/18/2011 3:46 PM, Roger Herried wrote:

I was appalled at Jaczko's press briefing yesterday when asked point blank how many nuclear reactors in the US were near faults...

Instead of answering the question he said that all reactors near faults designed withstand both quakes and tsunami events. If I'd been in the room, I would have had to be arrested to keep me from jumping on top of that SOB...

There was no followup question as to whether or not this country's evacuation plans would do any better than Japan's.

In 1986, after the Chernobyl disaster California ordered all nuclear reactors to evaluate their evacuation plans. I have the transcripts of that investigation... Of course, it was the Chernobyl disaster that launched the campaign that ended up with a public vote that shut down the Rancho Seco reactor near Sacramento California...

But there were several rather stark issues, not to mention the recently posted article that PG&E was allowed to go ahead without even having a real evacuation plan in place. More on this later...

The transcripts at San Onofre were especially telling. By the way San Onofre is just south of downtown Los Angeles, near Camp Pendleton Marine base, the home of Dick Nixon and actually a lot closer to San Diego than Tokyo is to Fukushima.

The first thing all the mayors, police, fire, CHP and regional officials were told that they would do a walk through rather than a test of the evacuation because a real test would be economically nonviable, as well as the fact that since there was never a chance of this happening that everyone would just do a verbal walk through together of a possible scenario.

Probably the most telling and insane piece came almost at the beginning when everyone in the room was told that the official plan called for everyone within 10 miles of San Onofre would be required to evacuate according to NRC requirements that people beyond this would told to stay in place and take shelter. He then told them that The California Highway Patrol (CHP) would be blocking all entrance and exits in the 50 mile radius around San Onofre so that people the closest could leave... Immediately after he said this a mayor of a city just outside the 10 mile evacuation zone spoke up and said that if this was the plan then the first people to die would be the CHP!

About the Diablo Canyon Nuclear facility:

1. The reactors at Diablo were the most fought over anti-nuclear battle ever, having been opposed by the local chapter of the Sierra Club since it was proposed in 1963. The Sierra Club national headquarters, which had been bribed by PG&E, ordered the San Luis Obispo chapter not to oppose Diablo, so instead they formed a new group to do so with their primary concern being faultlines, based on the memory that a major quake in 1927 destroyed a nearby city.

There were allegations from the start that PG&E covered up the fact that the reactors were located 2.2 miles from the Hosgri faultline because they had just gone through the nations first anti-nuclear battle between 1958-63 over their attempt to build 4 reactors less than 1000 feet from the 1906 quake line that destroyed San Francisco. Students within the Sierra Club played a major role in forcing PG&E from stopping construction of the complex leaving behind an 8 million dollar duck pond at Bodega Bay. The wife of the president of the Sierra Club was elected onto PG&E's board for her work in getting Diablo Canyon sited. This major scandal would play a major roll in David Brower quitting the club and forming Friends of the Earth.

The state and the federal government refused to listen to local concerns about the faultline until an LA journalist discovered reports of the faultline in 1972, which forced PG&E to rebuild the reactors. PG&E was then forced to rebuild them again in 1981 after the Abalone Alliance's blockade, when a newly hired 25 year old engineer discovered that PG&E had built the seismic supports backward. It would not be until 1985 and 5.8 billion dollars (the original estimated costs was less than 350 million for both reactors) that the units would be ready to go online. One of the NRC Commissioners would leak the NRC transcripts to a local TV station showing that the NRC commission considered earthquakes to be on a par with snow or rain when they let PG&E go ahead with operation. Those leaked transcripts then resulted in a legal challenge by the Mothers for Peace that would go on until April 25th 1986 when none other than Robert Bork (of Nixon's infamous Saturday night massacre) made the ruling that looking at the leaked transcripts would be judicial activism so he refused to look at the leak transcripts that detailed the illegal NRC failure to take in seismic dangers.

But the real battle still didn't really end even after over 22 years in 1985, as there would then be 4 more years of hearings by the state of California as to how much the public would pay for them. The state government under democratic control at the time promised that only 2.2 billion of the 5.8 should ever be passed on. However, the next year, the republicans gained control of the state government and immediately replaced most of the PUC's leadership, resulting in PG&E getting everything it wanted. During the hearings I was able discover the fact that PG&E which was unable to get loans from anywhere in the world after the 1981 fiasco, was secretly given over $2.2 billion in loans from the Environmental Protection Agency by order of Reagan... The massive rate increase that followed the full ratebasing would nearly double California electric rates, that in turn led to a revolt that in turn led to the deregulation of electric industry that of course led to the 2001 energy crisis...

For anyone wanting to see a more detailed history of California's anti-nuclear history here's a link.

http://www.energy-net.org/01NUKE/CALIF.HTM


On 3/18/2011 10:24 AM, satellitejam wrote:

NRC asked to review safety of San Onofre and Diablo Canyon

This comes just after California's two Senate Democrats, Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, sent a letter to NRC chief Gregory Jaczko, asking the agency to review the safety of two plants located on the San Andreas Fault ­ the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, located in San Clemente, and the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant near San Luis Obispo.

And in a letter to President Obama on Sunday, Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., who serves on the Energy and Commerce Committee, questioned whether the United States is prepared to respond to a nuclear disaster.

"I am concerned that based on reports, it appears no agency sees itself as clearly in command of emergency response to a nuclear disaster," Markey wrote.

Entire article here:

http://www.nationaljournal.com/energy/doe-official-defers-to-nrc-as-lawmakers-raise-nuclear-safety-concerns-20110318

Keith Harmon Snow on Fukushima Dai-ichi: NUCLEAR APOCALYPSE IN JAPAN

3/18/2011

Dear Readers,

The article linked to below, and published just yesterday, came to me by way of the author, a friend.

I think it's the best thing I've read for anyone who wants to get brought up to speed regarding the Fukushima Dai-ichi disaster, and the nuclear-industry's many lies that got us to this point.

The lies continue...

Sincerely,

Ace Hoffman, Carlsbad, California USA


NUCLEAR APOCALYPSE IN JAPAN

LIFTING THE VEIL OF NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE AND COVER-UP

A Doomsday Scenario Unfolds With Characteristic Foolishness

17 March 2011

Keith Harmon Snow

www.ConsciousBeingAlliance.com (reprintings & republishing with proper attribution)

As the sun set over quake-stricken Japan on Thursday 17 March 2011, we learned that four of six Fukushima nuclear reactor sites are irradiating the earth, that the fire is burning out of control at Reactor No. 4's pool of spent nuclear fuel, that there are six spent fuel pools at risk all told, and that the sites are too hot to deal with. On March 16 Plumes of White Vapor began pouring from crippled Reactor No. 3 where the spent fuel pool may already be lost. Over the previous days we were told: nothing to worry about. Earthquakes and after shocks, tidal wave, explosions, chemical pollution, the pox of plutonium, contradicting information too obvious to ignore, racism, greed -- add these to the original Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Conquest, War, Famine and Death. The situation is apocalyptic and getting worse. This is one of the most serious challenges humanity has ever faced.

Continue reading NUCLEAR APOCALYPSE IN JAPAN. http://www.consciousbeingalliance.com/2011/03/japans-catastrophic-nuclear-power-cover-up/


Keith Harmon Snow is a war correspondent, photographer and independent investigator, and a four time (2003, 2006, 2007, 2010) Project Censored award winner. He is also the 2009 Regent's Lecturer in Law & Society at the University of California Santa Barbara, recognized for over a decade of work, outside of academia, contesting official narratives on war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide while also working as a genocide investigator for the United Nations and other bodies. The first UCSB Regent's Lecturer, in 1960, was Aldous Huxley; other recipients include Margaret Mead, Peter Matthiessen and Meredith Monk. https://artsandlectures.sa.ucsb.edu/RegentsLectureship.aspx https://artsandlectures.sa.ucsb.edu/Details.aspx?PerfNum=1386 https://artsandlectures.sa.ucsb.edu/pdf/RegentsLecturerList.pdf

Keith Harmon Snow USA

New site: www.consciousbeingalliance.com Old site: www.allthingspass.com Gallery: www.keithharmonsnow.com

Save a girl's life! www.stopexcision.net


SHUT SAN ONOFRE! The ride is over.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK5oX-5MeR8




Ace Hoffman
Carlsbad, California USA
Author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry
Free download: acehoffman.org
Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com
YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org
Founder & Owner, The Animated Software Company



Thursday, March 17, 2011

SHUT SAN ONOFRE NOW! Tomorrow might be too late and besides, the operators will be hung over!

March 17th, 2011

Dear Readers,

Happy St. Patrick's Day! Today, we probably ALL feel like getting drunk.

But so drunk we feel nauseous and want to throw up? No, thanks.

Many people in Japan are feeling that way now, without a sip of sake. Many more will.

Ireland, at least, has one thing to celebrate today: THEY don't have any nuclear power plants of their own. They thought about it, but Sellafield was already way too close. And free speech is a hallmark of Irish society, so nuclear power didn't get very far.

When Sellafield went up in smoke (then known as Windscale) Ireland certainly wasn't spared.

The worse nuclear disasters in history, in order, are, I believe:

Fukushima Dai-ichi, Japan
Mayak, Russia
Chernobyl, Russia
Sellafield, England
Three Miles Island, USA

Of course, ongoing nuclear disasters such as Hanford, Savannah River, Oak Ridge, the Nevada Test Site, Paducah, etc., and their counterparts in Russia and elsewhere are larger by some standards than some of these accidents, perhaps than all of them. Hanford didn't become "the most polluted place on earth" by accident, although it had many of those, too. It got there in a steady, relentless fashion. It was sacrificed.

The area around Fukushima Dai-ichi has been sacrificed.

I woke up this morning and watched the video I posted last night again. Despite having to capture some things off a television screen in the room (that's my wife, speaking after me, her voice quivering from having to do this same thing so many times before...) I think it tells a chilling story that will be repeated around the country and around the world in the months to come. It shows how nothing will happen, and the nukes will stay open, and it will be "business as usual" until the next disaster:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK5oX-5MeR8

This morning I read that Boxer and Feinstein, our two Senators from California, have sent a letter to United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chair Gregory Jaczko asking the commission to do a "full" review of the safety of San Onofre and Diablo Canyon.

What will THAT prove?

These plants won't be shut down by some corrupt commission, or some corrupt judge at the tail end of a corrupt system.

This earthquake was "unpredictable" according to the nuclear industry. But it wasn't at all!

More importantly, nor was the tsunami, which was the thing that apparently triggered the reactor problems.

Tsunamis seem about as predictable as clockwork and, uh, ahem... comets.

"The early nuclear reactors weren't designed for tornadoes," a former advisor to the NRC admitted in an article I read yesterday, adding: "until one came along in Arkansas, and then we thought, "We gotta design for tornadoes. It's not easy to be all-knowing."

All-knowing?

Tornados in Arkansas are a surprise to the nuclear engineers? According to David Okrent they are.

Large tsunamis and earthquakes in Japan and California are a surprise, too? According to San Onofre, they are.

Oh sure, "little" tsunamis and earthquakes are expected, and there-in lies the lie. What's the right definition of "little"?

Would closing San Onofre have a significant impact on Southern California's economic future, other than to help enable our solar energy industries? Probably not.

But will leaving it operating, and leaving its spent fuel along the coast have a significant impact on SoCal's future? You can bet your life on that one! In fact, if you live here, you won't have any choice but to do so.

Please help spread the news that San Onofre must be shut down permanently NOW! No more hearings are necessary, no more testimony. We've been through that. Now, a child can see the truth.

Besides, highly-qualified experts have testified for YEARS that this sort of thing could happen, as have thousands of citizens. We need the plants shut down NOW!

Please contact nukefree.org for more information, or NIRS, Beyond Nuclear, WISE, Bellona Foundation, etc.... Call our elected officials yourselves. Tell them how you feel.

Help save SoCal from becoming another Fukushima Dai-ichi disaster.

Please ask our elected officials to act on these issues immediately. The debate is won. Facts got in the way. Nuclear power has to go.

THE RIDE IS OVER.

Sincerely,

Ace Hoffman
stocking up on water and waiting for the Fukushima Dai-chi dusting in
Carlsbad, California USA


Here's an excellent short video commentary Karl Grossman just released -- http://envirovideo.blip.tv/
or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUx7gto8uj8



Contact information for the author of this newsletter appears below.


Ace Hoffman
Carlsbad, California USA
Author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry
Free download: acehoffman.org
Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com
YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org
Founder & Owner, The Animated Software Company



Update: Grim. "Worse than Chernobyl..."

3/16/11

Dear Readers...

The latest news is that the Japanese military are dropping sea water on the reactors by helicopter.

That sounds very inefficient, very ineffective, and very dangerous.

I described this event to a loved one today as one of the worst catastrophes in the history of humanity. What will she tell her 13-year-old while he watches the news tonight? That Ace is STILL saying the worst may be yet to come? That we might have one spent fuel pool fire after another... and dry cask fires, too... and more reactor meltdowns, and more explosions?

That over the next 20 years there will probably be more than a million dead in Japan from this accident, and thousands dead here in America?

Do we tell them that? These are pretty hard things to have to try to explain to a child.

Do we tell them the poisons are particularly bad for youngsters, infants, and fetuses?

"If you don't understand what's happening, you're probably so young that you REALLY need to know!! It will affect YOUR life most of all!"

There's no way to explain that.

Of course, you can always listen to the pro-nukers tell you not to worry because it can't happen "here", wherever "here" is for you. They will tell you the radiation levels from the Fukushima-Daiichi catastrophe will be little more than background levels by the time they get to you, wherever you are. They'll say background radiation is harmless and might even be good for you. They'll say it's just a dusting. That's it's all going to land in China. That the deaths from Chernobyl didn't happen.

They'll say it all.

Radiation sickness isn't pretty. People in Japan will be coming down with it in droves. Workers undoubtedly already are being visited behind plastic screens for the last time by their loved ones who, if they live close to the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, were also irradiated, but not as badly.

I spoke at a hearing last night, near my local nuclear power plant. It was a common council hearing in San Clemente, the city nearest the reactor. I've posted a You-Tube video from the event:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK5oX-5MeR8

The public speaking portion of the evening started with this author. The reactor company was allowed to speak last, for as long as they wanted. The representative explained that the reactor was built to withstand all foreseeable earthquakes in the area, and all tsunamis that they could foresee as well. And that was that. No talk of new studies, no talk of building the wall higher, nothing like that. Everything's fine at San Onofre, according to them.

Lately at all the hearings for San Onofre, the activists have been overwhelmed by plant employees, some of whom always speak, such as the union duckie, and some of whom just clap for their team and leave when its the activists' turn to talk.

There were NO employees making themselves obvious at this hearing, besides the one management representative. I did not see a single logoed shirt, patch, or San-Onofre beeper this time.

An emergency services person told us that KI is not indicated for people here in the United States. That was yesterday. Today the government admits that we will be getting some amount of radiation from this accident. However, KI consumption for the general public is still not indicated.

I asked several people to help me suggest what to do to prepare. You should not take KI unless authorities are recommending it (or you own a Geiger Counter and know it is properly calibrated, and have been checking it regularly, and are willing to go with that decision on your own...). KI has side effects, such as allergic reactions and so forth.

Dr. Carolyn Dean, a medical doctor, and also a naturopath, herbalist, acupuncturist, nutritionist, lecturer, consultant, author and friend, sent the following suggestion, after I sent her Dr. Brownstein's suggestions ( http://drdavidbrownstein.blogspot.com ):"I'm using some Iodorol anyway. It's a KI. I take 25 mg every day anyway and bumped to 50mg"

Dr. Dean also suggested investigating something called RnA drops ( www.rnadrops.com ). Their claims seem to both of us to be a bit extreme and confusing, but perhaps they're harmless, if nothing else!

Dr. Dean also posted a newsletter at her web site, with additional suggestions:

http://drcarolyndean.com/tips?e=0157-1&p=3214

The subject line of my newsletter yesterday called nuclear power"premeditated murde". I believe the proper term is genocide. Nuclear power is premeditated genocide.

It is clear now that this is worse than Chernobyl. The Japanese have been calling for U. S. military help at Fukushima Dai-ichi. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission says help should have been asked for sooner: They say the Japanese made mistakes that it's now too late to fix.

I think somebody wants to cover their posterior for a later investigation! Accidents like this can't happen here, the NRC will tell Congress soon. Our reactor operators would have called us in sooner! We would have known what to do! Sure.

Nuclear power will do this to us again and again, unless there is a global effort to close the plants. The local communities are profiting too much from the local reactor, it funds their schools and police and other local services. Everywhere jobs are hard to find and work is scarce. So nobody wants to close a reactor and put people out of work.

But look at the alternatives. No reactor is safe.

Sincerely,

Ace Hoffman, Carlsbad, California USA (images added 2025)

Animation of actual Chernobyl winds centered instead at Fukushima Dai-ichi:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tPT6VWZ9mk>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tPT6VWZ9mk

NYTimes animation of projected plume across the Pacific:
<http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/16/science/plume-graph>http://www.nytimescom/interactive/2011/03/16/science/plume-graphic.html?ref=science


Somebody sent me the following suggestions for an "anti-radiation" diet. It sounds like a healthy diet in any case! It's aimed at Depleted Uranium detoxification, but that should not matter -- your body can't tell the difference between "depleted" (toxic, radioactive) uranium and any other (toxic, radioactive) kind. Unfortunately, even if this diet works to help remove heavy metals, it won't do any good for the fission products that are also being released. (The site is having bandwidth problems, not surprisingly...)

From:
http://www.radiationdetox.com/depleted-uranium-detox.htm


Miso soup
Spirulina, chlorella and the algaes (kelp, etc.)
Brassica vegetables and high beta carotene vegetables
Beans and lentils
Potassium, calcium and mineral rich foods
High nucleotide content foods to assist in cellular repair including spirulina, chlorella, algae, yeast, sardines, liver, anchovies and mackerel
Cod liver oil and olive oil
Avoid sugars and sweets and wheat
A good multivitamin/multimineral supplement


Ace Hoffman
Carlsbad, California USA
Author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry
Free download: acehoffman.org
Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com
YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org
Founder & Owner, The Animated Software Company



Tuesday, March 15, 2011

The facts are in: Nuclear power is premeditated murder.

3/15/2011

Dear Readers,

You know it's bad when the U.S. Navy runs away! But they didn't want to be in the fallout zone. 100 miles away was still too close for them.

And you can be sure there's trouble when the citizens of the nation with the highest percentage of electricity generated by nuclear power -- France -- are being told by their government to leave Tokyo, 150 miles away from Fukushima-Daiichi. A French nuclear official on CNN just described the severity as "just below Chernobyl." If we're lucky it will stay that way. Odds are against that. Instead, two MORE reactors are reported to be "unstable" in Japan.

And yet, incredibly, pro-nukers STILL wish to minimize the danger from Fukushima-Daiichi by saying such things as: "the vast majority of the radioactive particles will settle over water..." and that Chernobyl "was unable to spread significant contamination more than 1000 miles."

Wow. Isn't that far enough? Haven't we had enough?

In truth, Chernobyl spread deadly radioactive contamination globally. What does the word "significant" mean to a pro-nuker, anyway? The test for indisputable statistical significance is a very hard test to pass, and worse yet, nobody's ever designed a perfect test. So they'll argue any statistic you give them. And rightfully so, I suppose.

However, Chernobyl's radiation produced significant health effects for thousands of miles. Fukushima-Daiichi will too. Chernobyl affected us ALL detrimentally. Fukushima-Daiichi will too. We each carry radioactive isotopes that came out of Chernobyl's core inside us, all the time. We will carry these isotopes, too.

Where Chernobyl's radiation settled on land, plants grew and livestock fed. People ate these things.

Within a few weeks, somewhere, something in North America will turn up contaminated. Then something else. "Slightly" elevated levels over widespread areas might even be noticed.

Winds over the Pacific Ocean can be astoundingly well organized and swift. It's not just the jet steam that moves swiftly. Great sheets of air thousands of feet thick move across the Pacific practically in lockstep in a matter of days.

"Fallout" -- airborne radioactive particles that fall out of the sky -- can take years, or even decades. Fallout from Chernobyl, fallout from bombs, fallout from routine releases from every nuclear power plant is an ongoing problem.

When the Pacific winds hit the North American coastlines and then the mountains, great storms develop in the Sierra Nevadas and among the coastal Redwoods and in the Rocky Mountains. That's when a lot of this stuff will rain out of the skies.

California uses that water to grow crops. After a few reports of radioactivity, how will sales be affected even if it's only "panic" that's setting in?

By now we all surely know that governments lie about everything having to do with nuclear issues. If they didn't, America's own 23 old and dilapidated General Electric Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactors -- the kind that have proven to be so uncontrollable in a disaster -- would be permanently closed right now, and all our coastal reactors would be, too, regardless of what type they are, and all our other reactors would be closed, too. But lies have sustained the nuclear industry for a long time, and they are coming at us fast and furious this week.

Radioactive rain is coming to America. The government will say that the levels are "harmless" and "insignificant" and "barely above background levels". It depends on how and where you measure it. And if there is some place where the levels are clearly NOT harmless, even by government standards, they will tell you they found the problem and have isolated it.

Mildly radioactive stuff will be ignored. A speck here or there will not be noticed. A lot of crops will not be checked. Farmers will not want their crops rejected!

Rains will come, water will run, and nothing will seem amiss. Radiation levels may, in fact, be barely above "background" levels. But that doesn't mean no harm is being done.

Even assuming the authorities tell the truth about the radiation levels they find, the idea that it is easily or properly comparable to background radiation is flawed, since all of THAT radiation is (theoretically, at least) unavoidable, and most of it is external anyway.

And besides: Background radiation causes cancer, too. Eventually, this confluence of accidents at Fukushima-Daiichi will add to everyone's "background" radioactive burden. This is a global catastrophe if ever there was one.

Even given that the "vast majority" of the poisons will settle out over the water, the total number of particles still in the air when the winds come to North America will still be "vast."

There are over 10,000 spent fuel assemblies at Fukushima-Daiichi, and it appears that some of them have burned already, or will soon burn.

ONE fuel assembly contains roughly 500 pounds of uranium. If it's from the MOX reactor, it will contain about 3% plutonium in with the uranium. Radioactive strontium, cesium, iodine and other fission products that are created during the fission process don't account for much of the weight, even in highly irradiated fuel rods, but they carry a terrible radioactive burden, because they decay so fast, because they get in our bodies so easily, and because once there, they damage our DNA.

Radioactive tritium is produced in copious quantities, either when deuterium (a stable isotope of hydrogen) in the water that surrounds the fuel captures a neutron, or when lithium captures a neutron and splits into a helium atom and a tritium atom.

Fission products get into our food supplies and mimic stable isotopes of the same elements. Fission products tend to have half-lives measured many orders of magnitude shorter than even the fastest-decaying Uranium atoms. This does have some advantages. For instance Iodine-131 has a half-life of about eight days, so by the time Fukushima-Daiichi's Iodine-131 reaches us, probably more than half will have decayed, and some will have fallen out of the sky to decay in the water.

But even after eight days, a lot of Iodine-131 will remain in the atmosphere until it reaches North America. A rainbow of other radioactive isotopes will also be present, with a variety of half-lives, energy levels, and emission types.

A single pound of plutonium is approximately enough to kill everyone on earth. A vanishingly small speck of plutonium caught in your lungs is a virtually certain death sentence. So therefore, ONE MOX fuel rod assembly has enough plutonium to kill every person on earth more than a dozen times over, if we each were to ingest the whole burden.

How many fuel rod assemblies have burned so far? How many will burn before this is over?

Spread across the globe, who knows precisely how many people one fuel rod assembly will kill? The poisons will be in the environment for hundreds of centuries....

Some fission products only last in the environment for a few seconds. But some last for millennia -- there is a group I call "the ignoble seven" that will poison us all essentially forever.

Even assuming the vast majority of the poisons wash out of the air and into the sea, that's not so good, either. It's currently settling onto (nuclear) aircraft carriers carrying our young sailors, onto freighters with baby toys made in Japan, for our children to chew on later, and onto the fish we will eat.

The deaths from Fukushima-Daiichi will be impossible to count precisely. You can't prove anything. 25 years from now pro-nukers will still be saying: "Nobody in North America died because of Fukushima-Daiichi." It won't be true.

Dr. Janette Sherman translated the definitive study of Chernobyl's death toll. The book, published last year by the National Academy of Sciences in New York, indicates that about a million deaths appears statistically reasonable to assume. But the real figure is anybody's guess.

The Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI), the advocacy group of the American nuclear power industry, is still saying that "only" around 50 deaths were caused by Chernobyl. The "official" estimate of the Chernobyl death toll, published jointly by the IAEA and WHO, and heaveily biased in favor of minimizing the risk to support nuclear power, suggests several thousand.

But the meta-research of thousands of studies (IAEA/WHO only looked at about 350 studies -- less than 1% of what is available) suggests about a million deaths so far.

It might be more deaths, perhaps many more. It might be less, but not much less.

Catastrophic nuclear accidents will continue until we shut the plants down FOREVER. The spent fuel will still be a hazard, but the operating reactors are the MOST capable of causing problems, and we have to shut them down NOW.

There are clean energy alternatives. Too bad Japan wasn't using them. They could have been.

This disaster could happen again somewhere else at any moment.

There are over 500 nuclear power plants capable of similar disasters in the world today. This is an utterly failed technology.

The facts are in: Nuclear power is premeditated murder.

Sincerely,

Ace Hoffman, Carlsbad, California USA

The author has deplored nuclear power since before Three Mile Island and deplores it more than ever today. Please see his 2008 book: THE CODE KILLERS (a free download) for quick answers to questions about radiation, dose measurement, and other issues related to nuclear power: www.acehoffman.org

A quick lesson on pacific winds and fallout patterns: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tPT6VWZ9mk>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tPT6VWZ9mk



Contact information for the author of this newsletter:

Ace Hoffman
Carlsbad, California USA
Author, The Code Killers:
An Expose of the Nuclear Industry
Free download: acehoffman.org
Blog: acehoffman.blogspot.com
YouTube: youtube.com/user/AceHoffman
Email: ace [at] acehoffman.org
Founder & Owner, The Animated Software Company