Thursday, September 27, 2012

Re: URGENT: Alert: Online WSJ Poll on Nuclear Energy

9/26/2012

Dear Readers,

This Wall Street Journal poll is biased and unprofessional: Its lead-in commentary ignores global health issues, it doesn't mention the huge tracts of land that have had to be permanently evacuated, it claims that nukes can solve global warming, and it ignores the problems of spent fuel. I could go on, but we should all go and vote anyway, and tell all your friends to vote, too! You can be sure the pro-nukers are doing the same thing -- and they got a head start because they all read the WSJ!!

Ace Hoffman
Carlsbad, CA
--------------------------------------------------------------

Full link to WSJ poll:

<http://blogs.wsj.com/ideas-market/2012/09/25/vote-should-the-world-increase-its-reliance-on-nuclear-energy/>http://blogs.wsj.com/ideas-market/2012/09/25/vote-should-the-world-increase-its-reliance-on-nuclear-energy/


At 02:41 PM 9/26/2012 -0400, "Ulrich, Kendra" <KUlrich@foe.org> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>The Wall Street Journal is <http://blogs.wsj.com/ideas-market/2012/09/25/vote-should-the-world-increase-its-reliance-on-nuclear-energy/>running a poll regarding the future for nuclear energy in this country. The pro-nuke votes are way up. If you have not already voted, please take a moment to vote NO!
>
>Best,
>
>Kendra
>
>P.S. If you received two of this message, I apologize. Some said the link in the earlier email was not working.
>
>
>Kendra Ulrich
>
>Nuclear Campaigner
>FoE Bullet Points
> Friends of the Earth
>Washington, DC 20005